A generalized deep learning model to detect and classify volcano seismicity

Main Article Content

David Fee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-9977
Darren Tan
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8210-6041
John Lyons
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-1698
Mariangela Sciotto
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-1392
Andrea Cannata
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-5822
Alicia Hotovec-Ellis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-0205
Társilo Girona
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-0422
Aaron Wech
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-1991
Diana Roman
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-5803
Matthew Haney
Silvio De Angelis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-3056

Abstract

Volcano seismicity is often detected and classified based on its spectral properties. However, the wide variety of volcano seismic signals and increasing amounts of data make accurate, consistent, and efficient detection and classification challenging. Machine learning (ML) has proven very effective at detecting and classifying tectonic seismicity, particularly using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and leveraging labeled datasets from regional seismic networks. Progress has been made applying ML to volcano seismicity, but efforts have typically been focused on a single volcano and are often hampered by the limited availability of training data. We build on the method of Tan et al. [2024] (10.1029/2024JB029194) to generalize a spectrogram-based CNN termed the VOlcano Infrasound and Seismic Spectrogram Neural Network (VOISS-Net) to detect and classify volcano seismicity at any volcano. We use a diverse training dataset of over 270,000 spectrograms from multiple volcanoes: Pavlof, Semisopochnoi, Tanaga, Takawangha, and Redoubt volcanoes\replaced (Alaska, USA); Mt. Etna (Italy); and Kīlauea, Hawai`i (USA). These volcanoes present a wide range of volcano seismic signals, source-receiver distances, and eruption styles. Our generalized VOISS-Net model achieves an accuracy of 87 % on the test set. We apply this model to continuous data from several volcanoes and eruptions included within and outside our training set, and find that multiple types of tremor, explosions, earthquakes, long-period events, and noise are successfully detected and classified. The model occasionally confuses transient signals such as earthquakes and explosions and misclassifies seismicity not included in the training dataset (e.g. teleseismic earthquakes). We envision the generalized VOISS-Net model to be applicable in both research and operational volcano monitoring settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fee, D., Tan, D., Lyons, J., Sciotto, M., Cannata, A., Hotovec-Ellis, A., Girona, T., Wech, A., Roman, D., Haney, M. and De Angelis, S. (2025) “A generalized deep learning model to detect and classify volcano seismicity”, Volcanica, 8(1), pp. 305–323. doi: 10.30909/vol/rjss1878.
Section
Articles
Citation information
Crossref
This article has citations in Scopus
Link to article page on Google Scholar
Connected papers
Dates
Received 2024-12-19
Accepted 2025-05-05
Published 2025-06-12
Alternative metrics via Dimensions and altmetric

Metrics


Smart Citations via scite_